24 de setembro de 2009

Dmitry Medvedev

Discurso do Presidente da Federação Russa, Dmitry Medvedev
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.

23 September 2009

Today I would like to highlight five topics that are, as it seems to. me, important for all of us and for our common approaches to the international agenda.

1. Timing of this meeting.

The current UN GA session is taking place in a very crucial and uneasy point in time. Without exaggeration, we are living through one of the breaking moments of the modern history. Besides the economic crisis - the first wide-scale crisis of globalization era — the world development continues to be threatened by regional and local conflicts, terrorism and trans-border crime, food shortage and climate change. The impact of this crisis continues to be suffered by the majority of the countries of the world. Albeit so far we were able to avoid the worst scenario, the question is still pending: how the huge disbalances and deficits accumulated in the world and national economies amounting to trillions of dollars will be overcome?

The unification agenda has been dictated by life itself. And this dictates the growing demand for the UN as a time tested mechanism of harmonization of interests of different counties.

As never before, we are feeling the need for informal collective leadership; increased role of such formats as G8, and recently, G20, as well as other negotiation and mediation fora. These platforms act not against anyone but in favor of advancing converging interests of their participants. Their agreed approaches are being implemented through' the UN system as well harmonically complementing the comprehensive efforts of this Organization as a pillar of the current world order. Another distinctive feature of the modem time is the increasing role of the regional entities. They become even more active throughout all the continents. This trend is absolutely consistent with the principles of the UN Charter. Russia, on its part, will continue to strengthen the mechanisms of regional interaction together with its partners across the CIS and in the framework of the SCO and BRIC. These mechanisms help respond collectively to common threats, and mitigate the consequences of the crisis for our citizens and increase sustainability of national economies.

2 Existing problems.

Let me dwell on those which cannot be effectively addressed without and beyond the United Nations.

The first one is the disbalance of currently existing mechanisms of world economy governance, inadequacy of their "rules of the game", the gap between the financial markets and the real sector of economy. We need to make joint efforts to establish such financial and economic model that would guarantee everyone from such turmoil in the future.

In fact, all countries have confronted a drop in volumes of output and the living standard of. millions of people. The crisis has exacerbated social problems; and became a trial for the young people at the start of their life; and caused significant growth in unemployment.

A painful blow was delivered to our plans to alleviate poverty. A real threat of disruption of the Millennium Development Goals has manifested itself. We must do our utmost to prevent such a development.

The donor assistance to the countries in need cannot be put off "to the later". The tasks assigned as priority by the world community must be addressed by all means. The arrangements made at the G20 Summits and the UN Conference on world financial and economic crisis and its impact on development must be fulfilled.

The second major task here is to address the issues of global energy security.

Three years ago at the Saint Petersburg G8 Summit, principles of a new legal framework for such cooperation were formulated. The goal is to harmonize the interests of all participants in the energy "chain": suppliers, consumers and transiters. Recently, we have specified these principles and invite everyone to engage in further constructive discussion. We believe that these discussions should be conducted with active involvement of profile multilateral institutions including the UN. family agencies.

The third task that Russia deems important is the throughout strengthening of the United Nations potential. The UN must rationally adapt itself to [new] world realities. It should also strengthen its influence and preserve its multinational nature and integrity of the UN Charter provisions.

The reform of the UN Security Council is an essential component of its revitalization. The time has come to speed up the search for a compromise formula of its expansion and increased efficiency of its work.

3. Disarmament.

A highly challenging task is to move forward the process of multilateral disarmament under the UN auspices. You are aware that positive trends have emerged in overcoming the protracted crisis in this area. The Conference on Disarmament in Geneva has adapted its program of work. Let me mention the Russian-Chinese initiative regarding a treaty on the prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space as well as our proposal to universalize the Russian-American Treaty on the Elimination of the Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles.

Russia will steadily follow the path of verifiable and irreversible reductions in nuclear weapons as an essential element of "the new start" in our relations with the United States. President Obama and I signed a relevant document in Moscow last June. A mandate for further negotiations was agreed upon — to elaborate a legally binding treaty. This treaty should replace the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, which expires this December.

I would like to emphasize the objective relationship between strategic offensive and defensive arms. The recently announced adjustments in the US plans of missile defense system development are in our view a constructive step in the right direction that deserved the positive response of the international community. We are prepared to engage in a thorough discussion of the US proposals and relevant Russia's initiatives regarding cooperation in this area to reach generally acceptable arrangements. The real progress in nuclear disarmament is impossible without addressing such matters of principle as NMD and non-nuclear SOA potential. I expect that the work on a new treaty will be fully consistent with relevant provisions of the joint document endorsed by the US President and me during our meeting in Moscow. We believe that other nuclear States should join the disarmament efforts of Russia and the United States. It is not necessary to wait for further progress in the Russian-American disarmament process. We can start elaborating in advance acceptable and practical arrangements that take into account the differences in the size of potentials. For instance, we can use as an example the decisions of the 1921- 1922 Washington Conference on the naval armaments when the participants agreed on their maximum size of their fleets without trying to achieve their equal levels. If we use the same approach today based on the actual status of nuclear powers arsenal we will give the rest of the world a necessary signal of certainty that the unaccounted numbers will be added to the "equation" of strategic stability.

The 2010 NPT Review Conference will focus on the issues of nuclear disarmament, strengthening of the nuclear non-proliferation regime and peaceful atom. We are looking forward to its success.

The Global Nuclear Security Summit scheduled for next April will provide a good opportunity for a more detailed discussion of these issues.

We have also agreed with the US Administration on joint steps for further progress in such aspects of nuclear security as prevention of nuclear terrorism, and expanding the access for all good faith NPT Members to the achievements of peaceful atom. We call for collective cooperation on these matters.

In order to reach a common understanding on such important issues we must engage all nations and influential international organizations into the abovementioned negotiation processes. The international community has at its disposal such well-tested measures for increasing the level of regional and international security as nuclear free zones. In particular, there is an urgent task of establishing a zone free of all types of WMDs and their means of delivery in the Middle East. This is a long-standing issue. And the 1995 NPT Review Conference had adopted a relevant resolution in this regard. Russia as a member of the Quartet of international mediators on the Middle East settlement consistently supports the efforts aimed at strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime in the Middle East. Russia has made specific proposals in the framework of the NPT review process to search for generally acceptable ways of implementing the relevant NPT decisions. All countries of the region need to take an active stance on this issue and demonstrate their willingness to ensure a real progress in establishing a nuclear free zone.

We also need to speed up the work towards a mechanism to ensure peace and security in North-East Asia. Russia made its proposals in this regard to the participants in the Six-Party Talks. Under the present circumstances this task becomes even more urgent.

4. Regional conflicts and regional security.

We intend to continue to participate in the search for efficient options of settlement for regional conflicts. We are convinced that the use of force can only aggravate this situation. This was demonstrated by a reckless attempt of the Georgian authorities to resolve the problems in their relations with South Ossetia by military means.

Then, in August 2008, we were very close to the situation when a local armed conflict could grow into a full-scale war. I am certain that this is understood by everyone and in order to avoid repetition of such developments we need to have clear and effective mechanisms to implement the principle of indivisibility of security. Without it we will not be able to step over the legacy of the past era, to overcome its instincts and prejudices. Moreover, the irresponsible regimes should not have any opportunity whatsoever to cause disputes among other counties.

The role and place of the modern nations in ensuring global security is one of the most relevant topics. We have repeatedly witnessed situations when the problems emerging on the territory of individual states acquired regional or even global character. Incompetence and inefficiency of national government institutions can provoke consequences that represent risk for several countries. Of course, the prevention of such consequences is a complex issue. But we must think it over together as well.

These issues were at the focus of discussion in the Russian- city of Yaroslavl where a representative international conference was held. The outcome of this discussion is that the future belongs to the smart politics. The current global crisis is not only the crisis of economy but also the crisis of ideas. It accumulates a "critical mass" of outdated policies and development models.

Russia has come up with the initiative to sign a European security treaty and proposed a fresh look at this problem so as to abandon the outdated policies. The Cold War is over. But the world has not become more secure. And this is already a fact known to everyone. Today we need genuinely modern solutions. We also need clear legal framework for already existing political commitments. This includes obligations that would strengthen the following principle: not to ensure one's own security at the expense of security of others.

Our initiative concerns the Euro-Atlantic space. However, its key provision on indivisibility of security is a universal principle applicable to all regions of the world that is fully consistent with the letter and spirit of the UN Charter. The principle of indivisibility of security should become an integral part of the international law.

5. Values.

The protection of human rights and interests, universal application of generally recognized norms and principles in this area should become a basis for strengthening confidence and stability in the international relations. We all share the values that are rooted in the norms of morality, religions, customs and traditions. I am talking about such essential concepts as the right to live, tolerance to dissent, responsibility towards one's family, charity and compassion. This is the basis for both the daily life of people and relations among States.

However, the world is witnessing growing nationalist moods, numerous manifestations of religious intolerance and animosity. Therefore, we consider it to be extremely useful to establish a High Level Group on interreligious dialogue under the UNESCO Director-General. This is especially relevant on the eve of 2010 declared by the UN as the year for Rapprochement of Cultures.

And finally, I cannot but touch upon one more topic as I stand on this podium.

Next year we are going to celebrate the 65th anniversary of the end of the World War II. Russia made a proposal to adopt a relevant UN GA resolution and hold in May next year its special session to commemorate all victims of that war. We cannot allow its horrible lessons to be forgotten.

However, from time to time we see the neo-Nazi organizations raising their head. Racial, national or ethnic crimes are being committed. Attempts are being made to whitewash the Nazism, to deny Holocaust, revise the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunal.

I am convinced that firm and joint resistance to manifestations of neo-Nazism and attempts to revise the results of the World War II enshrined in the UN Charter should remain a priority task for the United Nations.

The creation of the UN has become one of the main achievements of the world community in the 20th century. There is no and cannot be an alternative to this organization and its fruitful activity. We have no right to forget that the UN possesses a unique international legitimacy. And we all must preserve and strengthen this shared wealth of the peoples of the world.

23 de setembro de 2009

Hu Jintao

Discurso do Presidente da China, Hu Jintao
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.

23 September 2009

The world today is undergoing major development, major changes and major adjustments.

The trend towards peace, development and cooperation, which represent the call of our times, has grown stronger than ever. As the world moves further toward multi-polarity and economic globalization, multilateralism and democracy in international relations have won greater popular support, while opening up and cooperation for mutual benefit and win-win progress have become the shared aspirations of the international community. Countries have become more interdependent.

At the same time, the world remains under the impact of the financial crisis and the prospects for an economic recovery are still not clear. Unemployment and poverty worldwide are worsening and development imbalances are more acute. Global issues such as climate change, food security, energy and resource security and public health security have been thrown into sharp relief. Non-traditional security threats, including terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, transnational organized crime and major communicable diseases, are menacing our world. Some long-standing hotspot issues remain unresolved, and regional or local conflicts keep flaring up. The instability and uncertainties in the international landscape pose severe challenges to world peace and development.

In the face of unprecedented opportunities and challenges, we, members of the international community, should commit ourselves to peace, development, cooperation, common progress and tolerance and continue our joint endeavor to build a harmonious world of enduring peace and common prosperity and contribute to the noble cause of peace and development of mankind.

First, we should view security in a broader perspective and safeguard world peace and stability. The security of all countries has never been as closely interconnected as it is today, and security now covers more areas than ever before. Traditional and non-traditional security threats are intertwined, involving political, military, economic, cultural and other fields. They are our common challenges that require a joint and comprehensive response.

Security is not a zero-sum game, and there is no isolated or absolute security. No country can be safe and stable in the absence of world and regional peace and stability.

We should embrace a new security thinking of mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality and coordination. While maintaining one's own national security, we should also respect the security concerns of other countries and advance the common security of mankind. We should adhere to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and seek peaceful solutions to regional hotspot issues and international disputes. There should be no willful use or threat of force. We should support the United Nations in continuing to play an important role in the field of international security. We should follow the spirit of equality, mutual benefit and cooperation to preserve global economic and financial stability. And we should oppose terrorism, separatism and extremism in all manifestations and deepen international security cooperation.

China has consistently stood for the complete prohibition and thorough destruction of nuclear weapons and a world without nuclear weapons. We call on the international community to take credible steps to push forward the nuclear disarmament process, eradicate the risks of nuclear weapons proliferation and promote peaceful use of nuclear energy and related international cooperation.

Second, we should take a more holistic approach to development and promote common prosperity. The deepening economic globalization has linked the development of all countries closely together. Without the development and equal participation of developing countries, there cannot be common prosperity in the world, nor a more just and equitable international economic order. The developing countries now face a deteriorating external environment, brought about by the international financial crisis. Their economies are slowing down and their development endeavors are beset by serious difficulties.

We believe that common development is an important way to redressing global development imbalances and achieving sustainable development. The United Nations should increase its input in development, advance economic globalization in the direction of balanced development, shared benefits and win-win progress, and foster an international environment conducive to the development of developing countries. The international financial institutions should use their newly increased resources, first and foremost, to help developing countries move out of poverty and provide loans to them in a more flexible, diverse, convenient and efficient manner. Great effort should be made to increase the representation and voice of developing countries in reforming the international financial system.

We should take responsible measures to counter the international financial crisis, firmly oppose protectionism and actively work for an early, comprehensive and balanced outcome of the Doha Round negotiations. Developed countries should open their markets to developing countries and reduce or exempt tariffs for those countries. They should honor their ODA and debt relief commitments, and in particular, increase assistance for the least developed countries with a focus on tackling issues like hunger, health care and education.

For developing countries, self-reliance is essential. They should explore development models conducive to their development and poverty eradication efforts. It is also in their interest to increase trade and investment cooperation and open markets to each other and upgrade South-South cooperation.

Third, we should pursue cooperation with a more open mind and work for mutual benefit and common progress. Climate change, food security, energy and resource security and public health security are all global challenges and no country is immune from them. The only way for us to meet these challenges and ensure harmony and peace is to engage in closer international cooperation. We should aim for common progress, bearing in mind not only the interests of our own people but also those of the people of the whole world, and expand converging interests.

Climate change is one of the serious challenges to human survival and development and international cooperation is the key to tackling this challenge. We should keep to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol as the primary channel in addressing climate change, abide by the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities", adhere to the mandate of the Bali Roadmap, and work for the success of the Copenhagen conference with a view to achieving mutual benefit and common progress. Food and energy are vital to the livelihood, development and stability of all nations. We should increase input in agriculture, develop advanced technologies, curb market speculation, increase food assistance and intensify cooperation in agriculture and food. We should strengthen mutually beneficial cooperation in energy, step up research and development of new and renewable energies, put in place a system for the research, development and dissemination of advanced energy technologies and diversify energy supply.

The continued spread of Influenza A (H1N1) has presented a global health challenge confronting the entire international community. China is ready to provide help as its ability permits to other developing countries in the prevention and control of Influenza A (H1N1).

Fourth, we should be more tolerant to one another and live together in harmony. Mutual learning and tolerance among different civilizations is an inexhaustible source of strength for social progress, and all countries, big or small, strong or weak, rich or poor, are equal. We should acknowledge differences in cultural tradition, social system and values and respect the right of all countries to independently choose their development paths. We should vigorously promote and protect human rights, increase dialogue and remove misunderstanding. We should advocate a spirit of openness and tolerance and let different civilizations and models of development draw on each other's strength through competition and comparison and achieve common development by seeking common ground while reserving differences.

The Chinese people will soon celebrate the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Sixty years ago, the Chinese people won independence and liberation after a prolonged hard struggle and became masters of the New China. Thirty years ago, the Chinese people started the historic journey of reform, opening up and socialist modernization. Since then, the Chinese society has shown unprecedented vigor and creativity. China's national strength has grown remarkably and the people are better off. China's development has contributed greatly to peace and development of the world.

History serves as the basis for further advance and provides inspiration for the future. We are keenly aware that China remains a developing country. The difficulties and problems we encounter are rarely seen in both scale and complexity. We have a long way to go before we can meet the target of building a well-off society in all respects that benefits over a billion people, and then achieving modernization and common prosperity for all. Bearing in mind our national conditions, we will continue to be committed to the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics, focus on economic development, unswervingly pursue reform and opening up, and promote all-round progress in the economic, political, cultural, social and environmental fields. Our development is for the people and by the people and its benefits are shared among the people. It is a scientific development that is people-oriented, comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable.

China's future is more closely interconnected with that of the world. A more developed China will make greater contribution to the world and bring more opportunities to the world.

We are committed to the path of peaceful development and the win-win strategy of opening up. We will develop friendly relations and cooperation with all countries on the basis of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. China has always been and will continue to be a positive force for world peace and common development. As a responsible and major developing country, China has always made common development an important aspect of its foreign policy. We have made great effort to provide support and assistance to other developing countries, and fulfilled our commitment under the UN Millennium Declaration. So far, we have given assistance to more than 120 countries, cancelled debts for 49 heavily-indebted poor countries and least developed countries, and extended zero-tariff treatment to commodities from over 40 least developed countries. Since the outbreak of the global financial crisis, despite great difficulties, we have kept the RMB exchange rate basically stable, which is important to maintaining healthy international trade. We have taken an active part in the trade finance program of the International Finance Corporation and provided financing support to the IMF, which will be mainly used to help developing countries. We have signed bilateral currency swap agreements with some developing countries. We have established the China-ASEAN Investment Fund, provided credit support to the member states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and actively contributed to the building of an East Asian foreign currency reserve pool.

To further assist developing countries:

» China will increase support for other developing countries hit hard by the financial crisis, earnestly implement relevant capital increase and financing plans, intensify trade and investment cooperation and help raise the capacity of relevant countries for risk-resistance and sustainable development.

China will continue to implement the measures announced at the UN High-level Event on Millennium Development Goals to assist other developing countries in speeding up development and facilitate the attainment of the MDGs.

China will follow through on the measures to help African countries announced at the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, increase assistance to Africa, reduce or cancel debts for heavily-indebted poor countries and least developed countries in Africa, expand trade and investment, provide human resources and technological support for African countries in such areas as agriculture, health, education and disaster preparedness and reduction, and intensify personnel training tailored to African needs.

China will continue to participate in and promote regional monetary and financial cooperation, maintain financial and economic stability and push forward financial cooperation and trade in the region.

We are called upon by our times to unite as one and work together for mutual benefit and win-win progress like passengers in the same boat. This is the only way leading to common prosperity. Let's join hands, share development opportunities, rise above challenges and make unremitting effort to build a harmonious world of enduring peace and common prosperity!

Gordon Brown

Discurso do primeiro-ministro do Reino Unido, Gordon Brown
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.

23 September 2009

We met a year ago, on the brink of a global crisis, and, as national leaders spoke in turn at this podium, the full scale of the danger became clear: a threat not just to jobs, businesses and life savings but - with the imminent risk of failure of the world’s banking system - the prospect of entire countries failing, as nations across Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America struggled to access credit.

The crisis demanded global action.

As never before, the fate of every country rested on the actions of all. And as the fear of the unthinkable took hold, we reached a clear choice: to fail separately or to succeed together.

At the G20 in Washington and again in London, we made our choice. Governments came together to begin the fight back against the global recession; we acted in concert, recognising:

• that national interests could be protected only by serving the common interest;
• that in this new global age the economy is indivisible and recession anywhere can
threaten prosperity everywhere;
• that for growth to be sustained it has to be shared;
• and that global challenges can only be mastered through global solutions.

So today we can draw strength from the unprecedented unity that has defined the past year - but we cannot be complacent. For while it may seem strange to say so after a time of such intense global action, our world is entering a six-month period which may prove even more testing for international cooperation.

We face five urgent challenges that demand momentous decisions - decisions that I would argue are epoch-making - on:

• climate change,
• terrorism,
• nuclear proliferation,
• poverty and
• shared prosperity

Once again we are at a point of no return. And just as the collapse of the banks focused our minds a year ago, so we must now grasp this next set of issues.

If we do not reach a deal at Copenhagen, if we miss this opportunity to protect our planet, we cannot hope for a second chance some time in the future. There will be no retrospective global agreement to undo the damage we will have caused. This is the moment, now, to limit and reverse the climate change we are inflicting on future generations. Not later, at another conference, in another decade, after we have lost ten years to inaction and delay.

And if in Afghanistan we give way to the insurgency, Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups will return and from that sanctuary once again plot, train for, and launch attacks on the rest of the world.

There can be no chance of a nuclear-free world, if we allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons and in doing so set off a new arms race.

There can be no global compact for jobs and growth if we choke off recovery by failing to follow through on the co-ordinated global fiscal expansion we agreed and put in place.

And if we do not act together to fight preventable illness, there can be no plan to save tomorrow the 12,000 children who are dying in Africa today and every day. So I say we need world agreement.

First, on climate change.

Despite the promises we have all made, the road to a successful outcome on climate change in Copenhagen is not assured. Why? Above all, because a robust and long term climate change deal requires money. If the poorest and most vulnerable are going to be able to adapt; if the emerging economies are going to embark on low carbon development paths; if the forest nations are going to slow and stop deforestation - then the richer countries must contribute financially.

That is why I have proposed a new approach to financing our action against climate change, which will provide substantially increased, additional and predictable flows, from both public and private sectors, of around $100bn a year by 2020. We must make progress on this in the coming days.

A post-2012 agreement on climate change at Copenhagen is the next great test of our global cooperation. Each of us has a duty of leadership to make it happen. We must build on our discussions at Secretary-General Ban’s meeting here this week. And I have said I will go to Copenhagen to conclude the deal. This is too important an agreement - for the global economy, and for the future of every nation represented here - to leave to our official negotiators. So I urge my fellow leaders to commit themselves to going to Copenhagen too.

Second - terrorism.

A safer Afghanistan means a safer world. But none of us can be safe if we walk away from that country-or from our common mission and resolve.

NATO and its partners from Australia to Japan must agree new ways to implement our strategy - ensuring that Afghanistan, its army, its police and its people assume greater responsibility for the security of their own country.

So too must we unite against every source of terror and injustice in our world.

It shames us all:

• that the people of Somalia and Sudan are still subject to the most terrible violence;
• that Israel and Palestine have still not found a way to live side by side in security and peace;
• and that for the people of Burma, their elected leader is subjected to a show trial and decades of incarceration.

There is more we can do; there is more we must do. And we must carry forward our efforts to take a more strategic, coherent and effective approach to peacekeeping and peacebuilding.

Third - nuclear proliferation.

Once there were five nuclear-armed powers. Now there are nine, with the real and present danger that more will soon follow. And the risk is not just state aggression, but the acquisition of nuclear weapons by terrorists.

So we are at a moment of danger when decades of preventing proliferation could be overturned by damaging rise in proliferation.

If we are serious about the ambition of a nuclear free world we will need statesmanship, not brinkmanship.

Tomorrow’s Security Council Resolution will be vital as we move forwards towards next year’s global nuclear security summit in April and the Review Conference in May.

My proposal is a grand global bargain between nuclear weapon and non nuclear weapons states.

And there are three elements to it where careful and sober international leadership is essential and in which Britain will play its part on the responsibilities on non nuclear states, on the rights of non nuclear states, and on the responsibilities of nuclear weapon states.

First, let there by no ambiguity: Iran and North Korea must know that the world will be even tougher on proliferation and we are ready to consider further sanctions. Britain will insist that the onus on non nuclear states is that in future it is for them to prove they are not developing nuclear weapons.

Second, Britain will offer civil nuclear power to non nuclear states ready to renounce any plans for nuclear weapons: helping non-nuclear states acquire what President Eisenhower so memorably called “atoms for peace.” With others we will be prepared to sponsor a Uranium bank outside these countries to help them access civil nuclear power. And Britain is ready to launch a new nuclear centre of excellence to help develop an economic low-carbon proliferation-resistant nuclear fuel cycle.

Third, all nuclear weapons states must play their part in reducing nuclear weapons as part of an agreement by non nuclear states to renounce them. This is exactly what the Non Proliferation Treaty intended. In line with maintaining our nuclear deterrent I have asked our national security committee to report to me on the potential future reduction of our nuclear weapon submarines from four to three.

Fourth, while economic cooperation has stabilised the international banking system and forged a foundation for the resumption of economic growth, recovery is neither entrenched nor irreversible.

The great lesson of the last year is that only bold and global action prevented a recession becoming a depression. We have delivered a co-ordinated fiscal and monetary response that the ILO estimates has saved 7 to 11 million jobs across the world.

So at Pittsburgh tomorrow, we must cement a global compact for jobs and growth - a compact to bring unemployment down and bring rising prosperity across the globe: • maximising the impact of the stimulus measures we have agreed, with proper planning of exit strategies, to make sure the recovery does not falter; that we do not turn off the life support for our economy prematurely; • facilitating agreement setting clear objectives on how each of us can best contribute to worldwide growth in the future; • and ensuring that such growth is balanced and sustainable.

We need strong economic co-ordination now as we navigate the uncertainties of recovery. I therefore propose that we launch the compact by agreeing that we are committed to high levels of growth on a sustainable and balanced basis.

This must be backed up by comprehensive reform of the financial sector, including international principles on bonuses. And we must strengthen our targeting of tax havens with, from next March, real sanctions against those jurisdictions which fail to meet global standards.

But the voice of Africa will have to be heard and heeded to bring recovery in areas devastated by the events of the past year and to assure that we do not put the millennium development goals beyond reach as a result of a wider failure of global responsibility.

In London, the G20 agreed measures to result in $50 billion for poor countries to help them weather the crisis. Because of London, the IMF can lend $8 billion instead of $2 billion over this year and next. This is already helping Kenya and Tanzania to increase government spending in response to the crisis.

For amid all the challenges we face, we must remember a promise we made 10 years ago.

And this is the fifth and final imperative: to achieve a vision for 2015 we are now in danger of betraying. On present trends it will take not five years as we pledged and not even 50 years, but more than 100 years to deliver on some of the Millennium Development Goals.

The unyielding, grinding, soul-destroying, so often lethal poverty I saw in Africa convinced me that unless empowerment through trade justice is matched by empowerment through free education and free health care, then this generation in sub- Saharan Africa will not have the opportunity to rise out of poverty and will never be fully free.

The greatest of injustices demands the boldest of actions.

Today - at this United Nations General Assembly - we will see the beginnings of universal free health care in Africa and Asia as Burundi, Sierra Leone, Malawi, Nepal, Liberia and Ghana all make major announcements that extend free care and abolish fees.

As a result of these actions, more than 10 million more people in Africa and Asia will now have access to free health services. Ten million who will now for the first time get the treatment they need without being turned away or fearing how they will pay.

I urge you all to match the leadership of these countries with your own support. And I commit the UK to doing so.

Let us remember how in 1945 nations facing a multiplicity of challenges summoned up the energy and vision not just to rebuild from the rubble and ruin of war, but to establish a new international order for shared security and progress.

The same principles must now inspire new and better, more representative, and more effective ways of working together.

And as we learn from the experience of turning common purpose into common action in this our shared global society, so we must forge a progressive multilateralism that depends on us finding within ourselves and together the qualities of moral courage and leadership that for our time and generation can make the world new again-and for the first time in human history, create a truly global society.

Fredrik Reinfeldt

Discurso do primeiro-ministro da Suécia, Fredrik Reinfeldt,
em nome da União Europeia,
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.

New York, 23 September, 2009

In the beginning, there were fifty-one nations. Committed to international peace and security. Sharing the common goal of developing friendly relations among nations.
Promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights.

Today, the fifty-one nations of the first General Assembly have become one-hundred and ninety-two.

Today, the General Assembly really is the town hall meeting of the world.

On behalf of the twenty-seven Member States of the European Union, I bring a message of cooperation and partnership. A message that our Union is open to the outside world.

* * *

Globalisation is good. Through globalisation, hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty. Information, ideas and inventions. Goods and services. It all moves quickly from one country to another.

We prosper from this. It enlightens us. It helps us understand the ways of other parts of the world.

But at the same time, globalisation means that one nation's problems will also come knocking at the doors of other nations.

Pandemics, food crises, organized crime. Trafficking in drugs and humans. Terrorism, violent ideologies. No longer limited by borders. No longer only one nation's problem. And so, we have to manage the risks and threats that follow.

In this work, we need the United Nation's broad-based legitimacy for international actions and norms to coordinate our efforts. And the United Nations, for its part, has to adapt to stay relevant and to be able to address the issues before us. The European Union wishes to contribute to these efforts.

We welcome the declared wish of the United States to work together with others in multilateral institutions. This opens the door to a promising new era in international cooperation.

* * *

We are facing one of the biggest challenges of our generation. Our world has a fever. And the fever is rising.

In the most vulnerable of the world's nations the consequences of climate change will be alarming. Starvation, severe flooding and climate migration will be a reality - even if we keep to the two-degree target set by the UN.

No doubt, developed countries will have to lead the fight against climate change. We will have to reduce emissions by twenty-five to forty per cent from 1990 levels to 2020.

But for emissions to peak by no later than 2020 - for them to be reduced by at least fifty per cent by 2050 and continue to decline thereafter - our efforts alone will not be enough.

The developing countries need our help. They need our help to pay the bill that we, through our emissions, have contributed to.

That is why the European Union last week agreed to start discussions on how much climate financing is needed in developing countries. That is why we are taking concrete steps. That is why we are putting one more brick into the negotiations. And we urge other developed countries to do the same.

At the meeting of the leaders of G8 and Major Economies Forum in Italy this summer there was agreement on the two degree target.

Now, we need to see increased commitment. Concrete mid-term targets by developed as well as developing countries.

If we want our children, and their children, to experience nature as we know it; we must act now. And every nation or group of nations has to do its part.

The EU is willing to do its part.

We will reduce our emissions. We will promote low carbon growth, contribute our fair share of financing and support adaptation worldwide. And we will remain committed to playing a leading role in bringing about a global and comprehensive climate agreement in Copenhagen in December 2009.

* * *

What started out as the pursuit of easy money, unhealthy risk-taking and, in some cases, pure greed, escalated this last year into a financial roller-coaster. The effects on both human security and development have been severe.

The European Union will continue to promote global financial stability and sustainable world recovery.

Firmly committed to taking comprehensive, targeted and coordinated action to support developing countries, especially the poorest and the most vulnerable.

Determined to reach a comprehensive agreement of the Doha Round, making sure it contains elements of real value for developing countries, particularly the poorest.

Continuing efforts to lift more people out of poverty in reaching the Millennium Development Goals and to achieve our respective Official Development Assistance targets.

* * *

Human rights are universal. Human rights are indivisible.

The European Union is a voice for human rights. We believe in democracy. We believe in the rule of law.

The European Union will continue to call for the worldwide abolition of the death penalty. In all cases. Under all circumstances.

The European Union will continue to stand up for the empowerment of women and gender equality. Without this, it will be impossible to draw on all those talents that are needed for a nation to move from poverty to development and prosperity.

* * *

To uphold these fundamental values we need security.

We cannot let war crimes, genocide or crimes against humanity go unpunished.

Therefore, the work of the International Criminal Court is fully supported by the European Union.

We cannot allow anyone to, by threat or use of force, act against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. The rules of international law apply equally to all states, large and small.

The European Union stands ready to continue working with the United Nations in peacekeeping and peace building. We also conduct our own peacekeeping efforts - often in close cooperation with the UN. The transfers of responsibilities in Chad and in Kosovo are examples of this.

Twenty years after the end of the cold war, peace and security is still threatened by the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; by the fact that these weapons risk falling into the wrong hands.

We strongly urge the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to renounce nuclear weapons and we stand ready to engage in this matter.

We also welcome the Global Nuclear Security Summit which will take place next year.

* * *

Europe and Africa are close. In geography - but also through globalisation and via strong partnership.

The European Union provides support to Africa when needed: Our naval operation, Atalanta, off the coast of Somalia, protects vessels delivering humanitarian aid, as well as providing support to AMISOM. We have for many years cooperated with the United Nations in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

We speak out on injustice on the African continent: The use of sexual violence as a weapon of intimidation and terror is appalling. The attacks on women and girls in Eastern Congo and other places are unacceptable. To protect we must empower. And so, to empower women in conflict situations, Security Council resolutions 1325 and 1820 have to be implemented.

We wish to see a free, democratic and prosperous Africa: This is especially true in the case of Zimbabwe. The Global Political Agreement and the formation of the Government of National Unity was an important step forward.

However, implementing the agreement requires commitment. It requires a spirit of cooperation. In this matter, much remains to be done.

* * *

Europe is a union of many cultures. Our openness to the world around us is evident in the fact that Christians, Jews and Muslims, those who believe in God and those who do not, can live side by side in mutual respect.

The European Union wishes to enhance its interaction with the Muslim world. Through the Alliance of Civilisations. Through cooperation in education and development. By providing opportunities for the young.

In this way, we can create an environment that will allow us to focus on what we have in common rather than on our perceived differences.

Afghan children show the same curiosity as children all over the world, including my own. Longing for knowledge, wanting to take part, full of excitement over what life has to offer.

In order to invest in the future of Afghanistan - in order to invest in human development - we can not let their light be shut out.

As a friend of the people of Afghanistan, the European Union is committed to assisting them in stabilizing, democratizing and developing their country. Education, also for young girls and women, is indispensable.

In the years ahead, we need to do more to ensure that this is the way forward for Afghanistan.

As a partner of Pakistan, we know that what happens in Pakistan not only influences the Pakistanis, but the development of the region as a whole. Therefore, it is crucial to continue assisting Pakistan in its efforts to develop the rule of law and to build a more stable, more democratic society.

As a friend of the people of Israel, we tell the Israeli Government to reach out for peace.
To end occupation. To respect international law. To work for a two state solution. To immediately end all settlement activities on occupied land, including in East Jerusalem. And to end the isolation of Gaza.

As a friend of the Palestinians, we expect them to stop all violent acts against Israel. To continue to build viable state institutions. To develop democracy and the rule of law. We will both continue to provide financial support to the Palestinian Authority and assist in capacity building on the ground.

In this matter, the European Union fully supports the United States' efforts. To resume peace negotiations and to stand ready to actively contribute to their success.

The future of both Israel and Palestine lies in cooperation.

As a friend of the people of Iran, we are concerned about the deteriorating human rights situation and the violent crackdown of popular protests. The Iranian nuclear issue represents a major challenge to international peace and security, to regional stability and to the non-proliferation regime. Iran must regain the trust of the international community, comply with relevant Security Council resolutions and contribute to peace in the Middle East.

As a friend of the people of Burma/Myanmar, we will tell the military leaders: only democracy and human rights can bring peace and stability to the people you say you represent.

* * *

The Swedish statesman and former UN Secretary-General, Dag Hammarskjold, once said: "The pursuit of peace and progress, with its trials and its errors, its successes and its setbacks, can never be relaxed and never abandoned."

This was true then and it is true today.

The people of the world need to know that uniting nations is not a work of the past, but of the future. Carried forward by shared values and by mutual respect. Ever more relevant with increased globalisation.

In this common endeavour the European Union will remain a reliable partner. For security, for development and for human rights. Always contributing actively to improving and strengthening the United Nations.

Always continuing to refine the instruments needed to deal with opportunities and threats alike.

Always willing to do its part in helping to create a better world to live in for future generations, everywhere.

Nicolas Sarkozy

Discurso do Presidente da França, Nicolas Sarkozy
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.

New York, 23 September 2009

In speaking to you in France's name today, I am well aware that we all have a historic responsibility under the current circumstances.

This 64th Session of the United Nations General Assembly is an extraordinary occasion. In the midst of a financial, economic and social crisis that has no precedent in the history of the United Nations, and faced with the threat a global ecological disaster, we have a duty to invent a new world where the follies of yesterday are no longer possible.

Tomorrow's world can no longer resemble yesterday's.

Now we all know towards what catastrophes our obstinate attempts to solve the problems of the twenty-first century with twentieth-century ideas and instruments may lead us.

We can no longer say that we did not know.

There is a universal awareness that the path that the world has taken over the last few decades is a dead end. This awareness is born of sorrow, suffering and fear. And we are politically and morally accountable for this sorrow, suffering and fear. We are accountable to the tens of millions of men and women who have lost their jobs, their homes and their savings, to the billion human beings who are suffering from malnutrition, to the hundreds of millions who have no access to water, energy, healthcare, education, to those who fear for their future and for the future of their children, to those who feel that no matter what they do, no matter how hard they try or how much they sacrifice, they cannot get ahead. To these people we must restore hope.

Hope to those who are paying for errors that they did not make, Hope to those who are outraged by the behavior of those who still continue to grow indecently rich, after leading the world to the brink of disaster, Hope to those who fear that, if we do nothing, they will be the victims of ecological and political catastrophes brought about by the depletion of natural resources and global warming, Hope to those who are still dying in absurd wars from another age, while humankind has so many challenges to face, Hope to those whose lives are growing harder and harder, who feel that they have been lied to for so long about the real state of the world, To all those we owe an answer. We owe them an answer to their suffering, fear and outrage. And this answer cannot be that everything will go on as before. This answer cannot be that everything will start over and that we will let it.

After what we have experienced in the last year, After such a narrow escape from the collapse of the entire global economy, After such a strong disavowal of our usual thinking, our certainties and our prejudices, the task before us is a great as the achievements of the men of good will who wanted to build peace on a new political, economic and monetary world order after the Second World War.

The world will change. It cannot be otherwise. Universal conscience is calling out for this change. But will it change because collectively we are able to show that we will act together with wisdom, intelligence and courage to imagine and build a better world than yesterday's world ?

Or are we going to wait until change is thrust upon us by fresh crises that we may not be able to control. We have already waited too long.

We have waited too long to remedy excesses in finance, and we now know what disasters these excesses can cause. We have waited too long to regulate globalization. We have waited too long to fight global warming.

We have waited too long to curb nuclear proliferation. And I would like to say to the Iranian leaders that they would be making a tragic mistake in relying on the passive response of the international community in order to pursue their military nuclear program.

We have waited too long to tackle the injustice, poverty and want that plunge part of humankind into the misery and despair that fuel hatred and violence.

We have waited too long to bring peace to the Middle East by giving the Palestinian people the State to which they are entitled in the name of Law and Justice and by guaranteeing the people of Israel the right to live in security, which the tragedies of History have made so necessary for them.

The crisis requires us to be imaginative and bold.

We need new global governance for politics, economics and the environment. The most developed countries cannot govern mankind on their own. Whole continents cannot be left out, nor billions of people who now aspire to play their part on the world stage. In dealing with the crisis, we all know that the G8 would not have had the strength, authority or legitimacy shown by the G20.

We know what we need to do now:

Increase the number of permanent and non-permanent members of the Security Council. It is unacceptable that Africa does not have a permanent member of the Security Council, or to exclude South America, with such a great power as Brazil, or India with its population of one billion, or Japan or Germany. Let us at least reach an agreement on a provisional reform by the end of this year. The legitimacy of the UN is riding on this reform, as is its capacity to take action at a time when the world urgently needs the entire international community to move to address unprecedented challenges.

We need to reform the IMF and the World Bank. Voting rights need to be more equitably distributed between countries. The institutions' missions need to be redefined. It would be a mistake to limit their role to upholding an orthodoxy that has been so severely shaken by the crisis. Their role should be to watch over the economic, monetary and social balance of the world. And they must be given the resources to do so.

Reengineering the international monetary system is a huge task before us. We cannot have a system based on just one currency in a world that has become politically and economically multipolar.

We have no right to give up on the goal of carrying through the Reengineering of financial capitalism started by the G20. Because a system where the real prices of risk or rare resources are not paid is suicide.

We need to eliminate tax havens, all of them. They are hiding places for money derived from speculation and fraud.

We need to curb the price swings of commodities that are subject to excessive speculation, starting with oil, since the economic, social and human costs of this volatility are unsustainable.



In Copenhagen, we need to commit to quantitative targets for greenhouse gas emissions. This cannot be put off any longer.

We need to set up a World Environment Organization in place of today's dozens of dispersed committees, secretariats and institutions if we want our future decisions to be fully implemented.

We need to acknowledge the legitimacy of a carbon tax border adjustment mechanism so that nobody can profit from environmental dumping.

What is at stake is vital.

We cannot let the law of trade be the only law. I believe in free trade, but there are specialized UN organizations that set fundamental standards: the World Health Organization, the International Labor Organization and, tomorrow, the 5 World Environment Organization. These standards need to be applied. Between international trade law, health law, labor law and environmental law, we need to set up a system for preliminary proceedings that gives all of these standards equal weight. But we cannot ask developing countries that are so far behind and the poorest countries that are coping with so many problems to comply with these standards without assisting them in their efforts. We all belong to the same human race and we all live on the same planet. We are all concerned by global warming, by injustice, by world hunger, by disease...

So yes, we need to be able to share our technology. So yes, we will need to come up with further resources for development assistance, for stepping up social progress, for meeting the ecological challenge together. I have no qualms about saying that these resources can be raised by taxing excessive speculative gains and economic rents if necessary.

We need to change the way we measure our economic and social performance. This change is no less important or less urgent. In fact, it is necessary if we are to change our behavior. I would like to call on all countries, on all international organizations, to have the recommendations made by the commission chaired by Joseph Stiglitz implemented as soon as possible so that we do not repeat the same mistakes and misjudgments as in the past. The task is a huge one, and it is only just beginning. This is all the more reason for moving fast and going as far as possible. We have run out of time. Each of us needs to realize what would happen if we had to just go home and explain to our fellow citizens that we are incapable of reaching an agreement to solve such serious problems.

I solemnly declare that nothing would be worse that a mediocre compromise in Pittsburgh and in Copenhagen. World opinion, and the current circumstances, demande that we find a real solution to these problems and not just go through the motions.

The threats of the worst crises are not behind us, but ahead of us. We are at one of those moments in history where political decisions have a profound and lasting impact on the future. We have no choice; we must take risks and act, since the greatest risk today would be to do nothing, to let ourselves be carried along by the force of habit, to take our time.

We do not have any more time...

Barack Obama

Discurso do Presidente dos EUA, Barack Obama
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.


September 23, 2009

Mr. President, Mr. Secretary-General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentleman: it is my honor to address you for the first time as the forty-fourth President of the United States.

I come before you humbled by the responsibility that the American people have placed upon me; mindful of the enormous challenges of our moment in history; and determined to act boldly and collectively on behalf of justice and prosperity at home and abroad. I have been in office for just nine months, though some days it seems a lot longer. I am well aware of the expectations that accompany my presidency around the world. These expectations are not about me. Rather, they are rooted – I believe – in a discontent with a status quo that has allowed us to be increasingly defined by our differences, and outpaced by our problems. But they are also rooted in hope – the hope that real change is possible, and the hope that America will be a leader in bringing about such change. I took office at a time when many around the world had come to view America with skepticism and distrust. Part of this was due to misperceptions and misinformation about my country. Part of this was due to opposition to specific policies, and a belief that on certain critical issues, America has acted unilaterally, without regard for the interests of others. This has fed an almost reflexive anti-Americanism, which too often has served as an excuse for our collective inaction. Like all of you, my responsibility is to act in the interest of my nation and my people, and I will never apologize for defending those interests. But it is my deeply held belief that in the year 2009 – more than at any point in human history – the interests of nations and peoples are shared. The religious convictions that we hold in our hearts can forge new bonds among people, or tear us apart. The technology we harness can light the path to peace, or forever darken it. The energy we use can sustain our planet, or destroy it. What happens to the hope of a single child – anywhere – can enrich our world, or impoverish it. In this hall, we come from many places, but we share a common future. No longer do we have the luxury of indulging our differences to the exclusion of the work that we must do together. I have carried this message from London to Ankara; from Port of Spain to Moscow; from Accra to Cairo; and it’s what I will speak about today. Because the time has come for the world to move in a new direction. We must embrace a new era of engagement based on mutual interests and mutual respect, and our work must begin now.

We know the future will be forged by deeds and not simply words. Speeches alone will not solve our problems – it will take persistent action. So for those who question the character and cause of my nation, I ask you to look at the concrete actions that we have taken in just nine months.

On my first day in office, I prohibited – without exception or equivocation – the use of torture by the United States of America. I ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed, and we are doing the hard work of forging a framework to combat extremism within the rule of law. Every nation must know: America will live its values, and we will lead by example.

We have set a clear and focused goal: to work with all members of this body to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies – a network that has killed thousands of people of many faiths and nations, and that plotted to blow up this very building. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, we – and many nations here – are helping those governments develop the capacity to take the lead in this effort, while working to advance opportunity and security for their people.

In Iraq, we are responsibly ending a war. We have removed American combat brigades from Iraqi cities, and set a deadline of next August to remove all of our combat brigades from Iraqi territory. And I have made clear that we will help Iraqis transition to full responsibility for their future, and keep our commitment to remove all American troops by the end of 2011.

I have outlined a comprehensive agenda to seek the goal of a world without nuclear weapons. In Moscow, the United States and Russia announced that we would pursue substantial reductions in our strategic warheads and launchers. At the Conference on Disarmament, we agreed on a work plan to negotiate an end to the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons. And this week, my Secretary of State will become the first senior American representative to the annual Members Conference of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Upon taking office, I appointed a Special Envoy for Middle East Peace, and America has worked steadily and aggressively to advance the cause of two states – Israel and Palestine – in which peace and security take root, and the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians are respected.

To confront climate change, we have invested 80 billion dollars in clean energy. We have substantially increased our fuel-efficiency standards. We have provided new incentives for conservation, launched an energy partnership across the Americas, and moved from a bystander to a leader in international climate negotiations.

To overcome an economic crisis that touches every corner of the world, we worked with the G-20 nations to forge a coordinated international response of over two trillion dollars in stimulus to bring the global economy back from the brink. We mobilized resources that helped prevent the crisis from spreading further to developing countries. And we joined with others to launch a $20 billion global food security initiative that will lend a hand to those who need it most, and help them build their own capacity.

We have also re-engaged the United Nations. We have paid our bills. We have joined the Human Rights Council. We have signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We have fully embraced the Millennium Development Goals. And we address our priorities here, in this institution – for instance, through the Security Council meeting that I will chair tomorrow on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, and through the issues that I will discuss today.

This is what we have done. But this is just a beginning. Some of our actions have yielded progress. Some have laid the groundwork for progress in the future. But make no mistake: this cannot be solely America’s endeavor. Those who used to chastise America for acting alone in the world cannot now stand by and wait for America to solve the world’s problems alone. We have sought – in word and deed – a new era of engagement with the world. Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.

If we are honest with ourselves, we need to admit that we are not living up to that responsibility. Consider the course that we are on if we fail to confront the status quo. Extremists sowing terror in pockets of the world. Protracted conflicts that grind on and on. Genocide and mass atrocities. More and more nations with nuclear weapons. Melting ice caps and ravaged populations. Persistent poverty and pandemic disease. I say this not to sow fear, but to state a fact: the magnitude of our challenges has yet to be met by the measure of our action.

This body was founded on the belief that the nations of the world could solve their problems together. Franklin Roosevelt, who died before he could see his vision for this institution become a reality, put it this way – and I quote: “The structure of world peace cannot be the work of one man, or one party, or one Nation…. It cannot be a peace of large nations – or of small nations. It must be a peace which rests on the cooperative effort of the whole world.”

The cooperative effort of the whole world. Those words ring even more true today, when it is not simply peace – but our very health and prosperity that we hold in common. Yet I also know that this body is made up of sovereign states. And sadly, but not surprisingly, this body has often become a forum for sowing discord instead of forging common ground; a venue for playing politics and exploiting grievances rather than solving problems. After all, it is easy to walk up to this podium and to point fingers and stoke division. Nothing is easier than blaming others for our troubles, and absolving ourselves of responsibility for our choices and our actions. Anyone can do that. Responsibility and leadership in the 21st century demand more. In an era when our destiny is shared, power is no longer a zero sum game. No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation. No world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed. No balance of power among nations will hold. The traditional division between nations of the south and north makes no sense in an interconnected world. Nor do alignments of nations rooted in the cleavages of a long gone Cold War. The time has come to realize that the old habits and arguments are irrelevant to the challenges faced by our people. They lead nations to act in opposition to the very goals that they claim to pursue, and to vote – often in this body – against the interests of their own people. They build up walls between us and the future that our people seek, and the time has come for those walls to come down. Together, we must build new coalitions that bridge old divides – coalitions of different faiths and creeds; of north and south, east and west; black, white, and brown.

The choice is ours. We can be remembered as a generation that chose to drag the arguments of the 20th century into the 21st; that put off hard choices, refused to look ahead, and failed to keep pace because we defined ourselves by what we were against instead of what we were for. Or, we can be a generation that chooses to see the shoreline beyond the rough waters ahead; that comes together to serve the common interests of human beings, and finally gives meaning to the promise embedded in the name given to this institution: the United Nations.

That is the future America wants – a future of peace and prosperity that we can only reach if we recognize that all nations have rights, but all nations have responsibilities as well. That is the bargain that makes this work. That must be the guiding principle of international cooperation.

Today, I put forward four pillars that are fundamental to the future that we want for our children: non-proliferation and disarmament; the promotion of peace and security; the preservation of our planet; and a global economy that advances opportunity for all people.

First, we must stop the spread of nuclear weapons, and seek the goal of a world without them. This institution was founded at the dawn of the atomic age, in part because man’s capacity to kill had to be contained. For decades, we averted disaster, even under the shadow of a super-power stand-off. But today, the threat of proliferation is growing in scope and complexity. If we fail to act, we will invite nuclear arms races in every region, and the prospect of wars and acts of terror on a scale that we can hardly imagine. A fragile consensus stands in the way of this frightening outcome – the basic bargain that shapes the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. It says that all nations have the right to peaceful nuclear energy; that nations with nuclear weapons have the responsibility to move toward disarmament; and those without them have the responsibility to forsake them. The next twelve months could be pivotal in determining whether this compact will be strengthened or will slowly dissolve.

America will keep our end of the bargain. We will pursue a new agreement with Russia to substantially reduce our strategic warheads and launchers. We will move forward with ratification of the Test Ban Treaty, and work with others to bring the Treaty into force so that nuclear testing is permanently prohibited. We will complete a Nuclear Posture Review that opens the door to deeper cuts, and reduces the role of nuclear weapons. And we will call upon countries to begin negotiations in January on a treaty to end the production of fissile material for weapons.

I will also host a Summit next April that reaffirms each nation’s responsibility to secure nuclear material on its territory, and to help those who can’t – because we must never allow a single nuclear device to fall into the hands of a violent extremist. And we will work to strengthen the institutions and initiatives that combat nuclear smuggling and theft.

All of this must support efforts to strengthen the NPT. Those nations that refuse to live up to their obligations must face consequences. This is not about singling out individual nations – it is about standing up for the rights of all nations that do live up to their responsibilities. Because a world in which IAEA inspections are avoided and the United Nation’s demands are ignored will leave all people less safe, and all nations less secure.

In their actions to date, the governments of North Korea and Iran threaten to take us down this dangerous slope. We respect their rights as members of the community of nations. I am committed to diplomacy that opens a path to greater prosperity and a more secure peace for both nations if they live up to their obligations.

But if the governments of Iran and North Korea choose to ignore international standards; if they put the pursuit of nuclear weapons ahead of regional stability and the security and opportunity of their own people; if they are oblivious to the dangers of escalating nuclear arms races in both East Asia and the Middle East – then they must be held accountable.

The world must stand together to demonstrate that international law is not an empty promise, and that Treaties will be enforced. We must insist that the future not belong to fear.

That brings me to the second pillar for our future: the pursuit of peace.

The United Nations was born of the belief that the people of the world can live their lives, raise their families, and resolve their differences peacefully. And yet we know that in too many parts of the world, this ideal remains an abstraction. We can either accept that outcome as inevitable, and tolerate constant and crippling conflict. Or we can recognize that the yearning for peace is universal, and reassert our resolve to end conflicts around the world.

That effort must begin with an unshakeable determination that the murder of innocent men, women and children will never be tolerated. On this, there can be no dispute. The violent extremists who promote conflict by distorting faith have discredited and isolated themselves. They offer nothing but hatred and destruction. In confronting them, America will forge lasting partnerships to target terrorists, share intelligence, coordinate law enforcement, and protect our people. We will permit no safe-haven for al Qaeda to launch attacks from Afghanistan or any other nation. We will stand by our friends on the front lines, as we and many nations will do in pledging support for the Pakistani people tomorrow. And we will pursue positive engagement that builds bridges among faiths, and new partnerships for opportunity.

But our efforts to promote peace cannot be limited to defeating violent extremists. For the most powerful weapon in our arsenal is the hope of human beings – the belief that the future belongs to those who build, not destroy; the confidence that conflicts can end, and a new day begin.

That is why we will strengthen our support for effective peacekeeping, while energizing our efforts to prevent conflicts before they take hold. We will pursue a lasting peace in Sudan through support for the people of Darfur, and the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, so that we secure the peace that the Sudanese people deserve. And in countries ravaged by violence – from Haiti to Congo to East Timor – we will work with the UN and other partners to support an enduring peace.

I will also continue to seek a just and lasting peace between Israel, Palestine, and the Arab world. Yesterday, I had a constructive meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas. We have made some progress. Palestinians have strengthened their efforts on security. Israelis have facilitated greater freedom of movement for the Palestinians. As a result of these efforts by both sides, the economy in the West Bank has begun to grow. But more progress is needed. We continue to call on Palestinians to end incitement against Israel, and we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.

The time has come to re-launch negotiations – without preconditions – that address the permanent-status issues: security for Israelis and Palestinians; borders, refugees and Jerusalem. The goal is clear: two states living side by side in peace and security – a Jewish State of Israel, with true security for all Israelis; and a viable, independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967, and realizes the potential of the Palestinian people. As we pursue this goal, we will also pursue peace between Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Syria, and a broader peace between Israel and its many neighbors. In pursuit of that goal, we will develop regional initiatives with multilateral participation, alongside bilateral negotiations.

I am not naïve. I know this will be difficult. But all of us must decide whether we are serious about peace, or whether we only lend it lip-service. To break the old patterns – to break the cycle of insecurity and despair – all of us must say publicly what we would acknowledge in private. The United States does Israel no favors when we fail to couple an unwavering commitment to its security with an insistence that Israel respect the legitimate claims and rights of the Palestinians. And nations within this body do the Palestinians no favors when they choose vitriolic attacks over a constructive willingness to recognize Israel’s legitimacy, and its right to exist in peace and security.

We must remember that the greatest price of this conflict is not paid by us. It is paid by the Israeli girl in Sderot who closes her eyes in fear that a rocket will take her life in the night. It is paid by the Palestinian boy in Gaza who has no clean water and no country to call his own. These are God’s children. And after all of the politics and all of the posturing, this is about the right of every human being to live with dignity and security. That is a lesson embedded in the three great faiths that call one small slice of Earth the Holy Land. And that is why – even though there will be setbacks, and false starts, and tough days – I will not waiver in my pursuit of peace.

Third, we must recognize that in the 21st century, there will be no peace unless we make take responsibility for the preservation of our planet.

The danger posed by climate change cannot be denied, and our responsibility to meet it must not be deferred. If we continue down our current course, every member of this Assembly will see irreversible changes within their borders. Our efforts to end conflicts will be eclipsed by wars over refugees and resources. Development will be devastated by drought and famine. Land that human beings have lived on for millennia will disappear. Future generations will look back and wonder why we refused to act – why we failed to pass on intact the environment that was our inheritance.

That is why the days when America dragged its feet on this issue are over. We will move forward with investments to transform our energy economy, while providing incentives to make clean energy the profitable kind of energy. We will press ahead with deep cuts in emissions to reach the goals that we set for 2020, and eventually 2050. We will continue to promote renewable energy and efficiency – and share new technologies – with countries around the world. And we will seize every opportunity for progress to address this threat in a cooperative effort with the whole world.

Those wealthy nations that did so much to damage the environment in the 20th century must accept our obligation to lead. But responsibility does not end there. While we must acknowledge the need for differentiated responses, any effort to curb carbon emissions must include the fast-growing carbon emitters who can do more to reduce their air pollution without inhibiting growth. And any effort that fails to help the poorest nations both adapt to the problems that climate change has already wrought – and travel a path of clean development – will not work.

It is hard to change something as fundamental as how we use energy. It’s even harder to do so in the midst of a global recession. Certainly, it will be tempting to sit back and wait for others to move first. But we cannot make this journey unless we all move forward together. As we head into Copenhagen, let us resolve to focus on what each of us can do for the sake of our common future.

This leads me to the final pillar that must fortify our future: a global economy that advances opportunity for all people. The world is still recovering from the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. In America, we see the engine of growth beginning to churn, yet many still struggle to find a job or pay their bills. Across the globe, we find promising signs, yet little certainty about what lies ahead. And far too many people in far too many places live through the daily crises that challenge our common humanity – the despair of an empty stomach; the thirst brought on by dwindling water; the injustice of a child dying from a treatable disease, or a mother losing her life as she gives birth.

In Pittsburgh, we will work with the world’s largest economies to chart a course for growth that is balanced and sustained. That means vigilance to ensure that we do not let up until our people are back to work. That means taking steps to rekindle demand, so that a global recovery can be sustained. And that means setting new rules of the road and strengthening regulation for all financial centers, so that we put an end to the greed, excess and abuse that led us into disaster, and prevent a crisis like this from ever happening again.

At a time of such interdependence, we have a moral and pragmatic interest in broader questions of development. And so we will continue our historic effort to help people feed themselves. We have set aside $63 billion to carry forward the fight against HIV/AIDS; to end deaths from tuberculosis and malaria; to eradicate polio; and to strengthen public health systems. We are joining with other countries to contribute H1N1 vaccines to the World Health Organization. We will integrate more economies into a system of global trade. We will support the Millennium Development Goals, and approach next year’s Summit with a global plan to make them a reality. And we will set our sights on the eradication of extreme poverty in our time.

Now is the time for all of us to do our part. Growth will not be sustained or shared unless all nations embrace their responsibility. Wealthy nations must open their markets to more goods and extend a hand to those with less, while reforming international institutions to give more nations a greater voice. Developing nations must root out the corruption that is an obstacle to progress – for opportunity cannot thrive where individuals are oppressed and business have to pay bribes. That’s why we will support honest police and independent judges; civil society and a vibrant private sector. Our goal is simple: a global economy in which growth is sustained, and opportunity is available to all.

The changes that I have spoken about today will not be easy to make. And they will not be realized simply by leaders like us coming together in forums like this. For as in any assembly of members, real change can only come through the people we represent. That is why we must do the hard work to lay the groundwork for progress in our own capitals. That is where we will build the consensus to end conflicts and to harness technology for peaceful purposes; to change the way we use energy, and to promote growth that can be sustained and shared.

I believe that the people of the world want this future for their children. And that is why we must champion those principles which ensure that governments reflect the will of the people. These principles cannot be afterthoughts – democracy and human rights are essential to achieving each of the goals that I have discussed today. Because governments of the people and by the people are more likely to act in the broader interests of their own people, rather than the narrow interest of those in power.

The test of our leadership will not be the degree to which we feed the fears and old hatreds of our people. True leadership will not be measured by the ability to muzzle dissent, or to intimidate and harass political opponents at home. The people of the world want change. They will not long tolerate those who are on the wrong side of history. This Assembly’s Charter commits each of us, and I quote – “to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women.” Among those rights is the freedom to speak your mind and worship as you please; the promise of equality of the races, and the opportunity for women and girls to pursue their own potential; the ability of citizens to have a say in how you are governed, and to have confidence in the administration of justice. For just as no nation should be forced to accept the tyranny of another nation, no individual should be forced to accept the tyranny of their own government.

As an African-American, I will never forget that I would not be here today without the steady pursuit of a more perfect union in my country. That guides my belief that no matter how dark the day may seem, transformative change can be forged by those who choose the side of justice. And I pledge that America will always stand with those who stand up for their dignity and their rights – for the student who seeks to learn; the voter who demands to be heard; the innocent who longs to be free; and the oppressed who yearns to be equal.

Democracy cannot be imposed on any nation from the outside. Each society must search for its own path, and no path is perfect. Each country will pursue a path rooted in the culture of its people, and – in the past – America has too often been selective in its promotion of democracy. But that does not weaken our commitment, it only reinforces it. There are basic principles that are universal; there are certain truths which are self evident – and the United States of America will never waiver in our efforts to stand up for the right of people everywhere to determine their own destiny.

Sixty-five years ago, a weary Franklin Roosevelt spoke to the American people in his fourth and final inaugural address. After years of war, he sought to sum up the lessons that could be drawn from the terrible suffering and enormous sacrifice that had taken place. “We have learned,” he said, “to be citizens of the world, members of the human community.”

The United Nations was built by men and women like Roosevelt from every corner of the world – from Africa and Asia; form Europe to the Americas. These architects of international cooperation had an idealism that was anything but naïve – it was rooted in the hard-earned lessons of war, and the wisdom that nations could advance their interests by acting together instead of splitting apart. Now it falls to us – for this institution will be what we make of it. The United Nations does extraordinary good around the world in feeding the hungry, caring for the sick, and mending places that have been broken. But it also struggles to enforce its will, and to live up to the ideals of its founding.

I believe that those imperfections are not a reason to walk away from this institution – they are a calling to redouble our efforts. The United Nations can either be a place where we bicker about outdated grievances, or forge common ground; a place where we focus on what drives us apart, or what brings us together; a place where we indulge tyranny, or a source of moral authority. In short, the United Nations can be an institution that is disconnected from what matters in the lives of our citizens, or it can be indispensable in advancing the interests of the people we serve.

We have reached a pivotal moment. The United States stands ready to begin a new chapter of international cooperation – one that recognizes the rights and responsibilities of all nations. With confidence in our cause, and with a commitment to our values, we call on all nations to join us in building the future that our people deserve.

Thank you. ###

Lula da Silva

Discurso do Presidente do Brasil, Lula da Silva
no Debate Geral da 64.ª sessão da Assembleia Geral da ONU.

Arquive-se.


Nova York, 23 de setembro de 2009

1

Meus cumprimentos ao Presidente da Assembléia Geral, Ali Treki, ao Secretário-Geral, Ban Kimoon, e a todos Chefes de Estado e delegados presentes. Senhoras e senhores, A Assembléia Geral das Nações Unidas tem sido, e deve ser cada vez mais, o grande foro de debate sobre os principais problemas que afligem a humanidade.

Quero abordar aqui três questões cruciais, que me parecem interligadas. Três ameaças que pairam sobre nosso planeta: a persistência da crise econômica, a ausência de uma governança mundial estável e democrática e os riscos que a mudança climática traz para todos nós.
Senhor Presidente,

Há exatamente um ano, no limiar da crise que se abateu sobre a economia mundial, afirmei desta tribuna que seria um grave erro, uma omissão histórica imperdoável, cuidarmos apenas das conseqüências da crise sem enfrentarmos as suas causas. Mais do que a crise dos grandes bancos, essa é a crise dos grandes dogmas. O que caiu por terra foi toda uma concepção econômica, política e social tida como inquestionável. O que faliu foi um insensato modelo de pensamento e de ação que subjugou o mundo nas últimas décadas.

Foi a doutrina absurda de que os mercados podiam auto-regular-se, dispensando qualquer intervenção do Estado, considerado por muitos um mero estorvo. Foi a tese da liberdade absoluta para o capital financeiro, sem regras nem transparência, acima dos povos e das instituições. Foi a apologia perversa do Estado mínimo, atrofiado, fragilizado, incapaz de promover o desenvolvimento e de combater a pobreza e as desigualdades. A demonização das políticas sociais, a obsessão de precarizar o trabalho, a mercantilização irresponsável dos serviços públicos.

A verdadeira raiz da crise foi o confisco de grande parte da soberania popular e nacional – dos Estados e dos governos democráticos – por circuitos autônomos de riqueza e de poder.

Afirmei que era chegada a hora da política. Disse que governantes – e não tecnocratas arrogantes – deveriam assumir a responsabilidade de enfrentar a desordem mundial. O enfrentamento da crise e a correção de rumo da economia mundial não poderiam ficar apenas a cargo dos de sempre. Os países desenvolvidos – e os organismos multilaterais onde eles eram hegemônicos – foram incapazes de prever a catástrofe que se iniciava e, menos ainda, de preveni-la.

Os efeitos da crise se espalharam por todo o mundo, golpeando inclusive, e sobretudo, àqueles que há anos vinham reconstruindo suas economias com enormes sacrifícios.
Não é justo que o custo da aventura especulativa seja assumido pelos que nada têm a ver com ela – os trabalhadores e as nações pobres ou em desenvolvimento.

Passados doze meses, constatamos que houve alguns progressos mas que persistem muitas indefinições. Ainda não há uma clara disposição para enfrentar, no âmbito multilateral, as graves distorções da economia global. O fato de ter sido evitado o colapso total do sistema parece ter provocado em alguns um perigoso conformismo.


2

A maioria dos problemas de fundo não foi enfrentada. Há enormes resistências em adotar
mecanismos efetivos de regulação dos mercados financeiros. Países ricos resistem em realizar reformas nos organismos multilaterais, como o FMI e o Banco Mundial. É incompreensível a paralisia da Rodada de Doha, cujo acordo beneficiará sobretudo as nações pobres. Há sinais inquietantes de recaídas protecionistas. Pouco se avançou no combate aos paraísos fiscais.
Mas muitos países não ficaram de braços cruzados.

O Brasil – um dos últimos, felizmente, a sentir os efeitos da crise – é hoje um dos primeiros a sair dela. Não fizemos nenhuma mágica. Simplesmente havíamos preservado nosso sistema financeiro do vírus da especulação. Havíamos reduzido nossa vulnerabilidade externa, passando da condição de devedores à de credores internacionais. Decidimos, junto com outros países, aportar recursos para que o FMI empreste dinheiro aos países mais pobres sem os condicionamentos inaceitáveis do passado. Mas, sobretudo, desenvolvemos antes da crise, e depois que ela eclodiu, políticas anti-cíclicas. Aprofundamos nossos programas sociais, especialmente os de transferência de renda. Aumentamos os salários acima da inflação. Estimulamos, por meio de medidas fiscais, o consumo para impedir que se detivesse a roda da economia.

Já saímos da breve recessão. Nossa economia retomou seu ímpeto e anuncia um 2010 promissor.

As exportações recuperam seu vigor. O emprego se recompõe de forma extraordinária. O equilíbrio macroeconômico foi preservado sem afetar as conquistas populares.

O que o Brasil e outros países demonstraram é que também nos momentos de crise precisamos realizar audaciosos programas sociais e de desenvolvimento.

Mas não tenho a ilusão de que poderemos resolver nossos problemas sozinhos, apenas no espaço nacional. A economia mundial é interdependente. Estamos todos obrigados a atuar além de nossas fronteiras. Por isso, é imprescindível refundar a ordem econômica mundial.

Nas reuniões do G20 e nos muitos encontros que mantive com líderes mundiais tenho insistido sobre a necessidade de irrigar a economia mundial com importantes créditos. Tenho defendido a regulação financeira, a generalização de políticas anti-cíclicas, o fim do protecionismo, o combate aos paraísos fiscais.

Com a mesma determinação, meu país propõe uma autêntica reforma dos organismos financeiros multilaterais.

Os países pobres e em desenvolvimento têm de aumentar sua participação na direção do FMI e do Banco Mundial. Sem isso não haverá efetiva mudança e os riscos de novas e maiores crises serão inevitáveis. Somente organismos mais representativos e democráticos terão condições de enfrentar complexos problemas como os do reordenamento do sistema monetário internacional.

Não é possível que, passados 65 anos, o mundo continue a ser regido pelas mesmas normas e valores dominantes quando da conferência de Bretton Woods.

Não é possível que as Nações Unidas, e seu Conselho de Segurança, sejam regidos pelos mesmos parâmetros que se seguiram à Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Vivemos um período de transição no âmbito internacional. Caminhamos em direção ao mundo multilateral. Mas também multipolar, seguindo as experiências de integração regional, como ocorre na América do Sul com a constituição da UNASUL.

3

Esse mundo multipolar não será conflitante com as Nações Unidas. Ao contrário. Poderá ser um fator de revitalização da ONU.

De uma ONU com a autoridade política e moral para solucionar os conflitos do Oriente Médio, garantindo a coexistência de um Estado Palestino com o Estado de Israel.

De uma ONU que enfrente o terrorismo sem estigmatizar etnias e religiões, mas atacando suas causas profundas e promovendo o diálogo de civilizações.

De uma ONU que assuma a ajuda efetiva a países – como o Haiti – que buscam reconstruir sua economia e seu tecido social depois de haver recuperado a estabilidade política.

De uma ONU que se comprometa com o Renascimento africano que hoje assistimos.

De uma ONU capaz de adotar políticas eficientes de preservação e ampliação dos Direitos Humanos.

De uma ONU que possa avançar no caminho do desarmamento estabelecendo um real equilíbrio entre este e a não-proliferação.

De uma ONU que lidere cada vez mais as iniciativas para preservar o ambiente.

De uma ONU que, por meio do ECOSOC, incida nas definições sobre o enfrentamento da crise econômica.

De uma ONU suficientemente representativa para enfrentar as ameaças à paz mundial, por meio de um Conselho de Segurança renovado, aberto a novos membros permanentes.

Não somos voluntaristas. Mas sem vontade política não se pode enfrentar e corrigir situações que conspiram contra a paz, o desenvolvimento e a democracia. Sem vontade política persistirão anacronismos como o embargo contra Cuba.

Sem vontade política continuarão a proliferar golpes de Estado como o que derrocou o Presidente constitucional de Honduras, José Manuel Zelaya, que se encontra, desde segunda-feira, refugiado na embaixada do Brasil em Tegucigalpa. A comunidade internacional exige que Zelaya reassuma imediatamente a Presidência de seu país e deve estar atenta à inviolabilidade da missão diplomática brasileira na capital hondurenha. Sem vontade política, por fim, crescerão as ameaças hoje representadas pela mudança climática no mundo.

Todos os países devem empenhar-se em realizar ações para reverter o aquecimento global. Preocupa-nos a resistência dos países desenvolvidos em assumir sua parte na resolução das questões referentes à mudança do clima. Eles não podem lançar sobre os ombros dos países em desenvolvimento responsabilidades que lhes são exclusivas.

O Brasil está cumprindo a sua parte. Vamos chegar a Copenhague com alternativas e compromissos precisos.

Aprovamos um Plano de Mudanças Climáticas que prevê uma redução de 80% do desmatamento da Amazônia até 2020. Diminuiremos em 4,8 bilhões de toneladas a emissão de CO2, o que representa 4 mais do que a soma dos compromissos de todos os países desenvolvidos juntos. Em 2009 já podemos apresentar o menor desmatamento dos últimos 20 anos.
A matriz energética brasileira é das mais limpas do planeta. 45% da energia consumida no país é renovável. No resto do mundo apenas 12% é renovável, enquanto que nos países da OCDE essa proporção não supera 5%. Oitenta por cento de nossa eletricidade provém igualmente de fontes renováveis. Vinte e cinco por cento de etanol está misturado à gasolina que consomem nossos veículos. Mais de 80% dos carros produzidos no país têm motor flex, o que permite a utilização indiscriminada de gasolina ou álcool. O etanol brasileiro e os demais biocombustíveis são produzidos em condições cada vez mais adequadas, sobretudo a partir do zoneamento agro-ecológico que acabamos de implantar no país. Proibimos a cana-de-açúcar e as usinas de álcool em áreas de vegetação nativa. A decisão vale para toda Amazônia e nossos principais biomas. O plantio da cana-de-açúcar não ocupa mais do que 2% de nossas terras agricultáveis. Distinto de outros biocombustíveis, ele não afeta nossa segurança alimentar nem compromete o equilíbrio ambiental. Empresários, trabalhadores e governo firmaram um importante compromisso para assegurar o trabalho decente nos canaviais brasileiros.

Todas essas preocupações fazem parte da política energética de um país auto-suficiente em petróleo e que acaba de descobrir grandes reservas que nos colocarão na vanguarda da produção de combustíveis fósseis.

Mas o Brasil não renunciará à agenda ambiental para ser apenas um gigante do petróleo. Queremos consolidar nossa condição de potência mundial da energia verde.

Por outro lado, deve-se exigir dos países desenvolvidos metas de redução de emissões muito mais expressivas do que as atuais, que representam mera fração do que é recomendado pelo Painel Intergovernamental para a Mudança do Clima.

Causa-nos também profunda preocupação a insuficiência dos recursos, até agora anunciados, para as necessárias inovações tecnológicas que preservarão o ambiente nos países em desenvolvimento.

A resolução desses e outros impasses só ocorrerá se as ameaças ligadas à mudança climática forem enfrentadas a partir da compreensão de que temos responsabilidades comuns, mas diferenciadas.

Os temas que estão no centro de nossas preocupações – a crise financeira, a nova governança mundial e a mudança do clima – têm um forte denominador comum. Ele aponta para a necessidade de construir uma nova ordem internacional, sustentável, multilateral, menos assimétrica, livre de hegemonismos e dotada de instituições democráticas.

Esse mundo novo é um imperativo político e moral.

Não basta remover os escombros do modelo que fracassou, é preciso completar o parto do futuro. É a única forma de reparar tantas injustiças e de prevenir novas tragédias coletivas.